I don't like spending large amounts of money at once. I'd like to think I'm not a tight arse..people may or may not disagree. What I mean is that when it comes to buying anything that are say over $50 I always think twice, and I've already done research to see how cheap said item is.
Monday, 20 April 2009
hmm
written by
Lando
at
23:28
0
comebacks
topics: facts of life, sounding board
Monday, 20 October 2008
in defense of... what?
I think one of the biggest struggles is about freedom. I was going to list all the differences I could think of but now I think that won't help things.
written by
Lando
at
05:10
0
comebacks
topics: art, moods and feelings, sounding board, T.I.R.L
Friday, 5 October 2007
a timely matter
ok, now my appetite has been whet, it is on.
I am incensed at the stupidity of people that are starting bushfires. In Sydney, where we've had water restrictions for years, and it's starting to get hot and dry. It doesn't take a 5th grader. The most recent one was started in the Blue Mountains (not far from where I live) by two 11-yr olds throwing a Molotov cocktail into the bush. I mean, really, where do I begin.
Sure, on the one hand, they're just 11 year old kids going, wow it would be fun to make a Molotov. Undoubtedly they would have been influenced by something they have seen, like a video game, movie, or the Internet. And it follows that being minors they would be unaware of the consequences of their actions. They probably wouldn't have considered beyond, yep, it'll be cool to see it explode, maybe burn something.
The cost of dealing with bushfires, be they natural disasters or man-made, is staggering. Aside from the physical damage by the fire to people's homes, land, buildings, loss of commerce, the cost of fighting the fire itself is enormous. Even when you consider that most firemen are volunteers, the cost of sending multiple trucks, crews from interstate, choppers to waterbomb, the cost of public service for evacuations, temporary accommodation, setting up helplines- the list goes on. Weigh that up against a bottle of oil and a rag and a lighter. Corporal punishment does seem like a very appealing option.
There's talk that the two kids are going to be charged with terrorism offences, in order to underline the severity of their actions. I think that's a bit much. I wholeheartedly endorse giving the guilty parties appropriate and serious punishments; community service won't teach them anything. But to call it a terrorist offence is a misnomer. The word "terrorism" has been thrown around so much by Dubya, that it's now become a buzzword. But that's for another post.
I believe there is definitely a time and place for corporal punishment, if not capital punishment. The humiliation of a public caning would definitely last a lot longer and affect them more than 500 hours of community service. It is easy to confuse corporal punishment with merely inflicting pain, when in actual fact the pain of the event is secondary.
At my old school in Ipswich corporal punishment was still used as a form of discipline. When I was in Year 8, I remember one of the parents made a complaint cos their son had been given the cane, for some repeated minor infringement. One of my old teachers replied, "It's not about the pain. The pain merely helps them remember the humiliation and shame of being caned." It follows that whatever physical pain is caused by the punishment, the emotional pain associated with the event magnifies the event. The power of the mind is much stronger than the power of the hand.
Suffice to say if these two were my kids there would be some serious smackdown to be laid...
written by
Lando
at
23:34
0
comebacks
topics: sounding board